PUBLIC BEARISH RESEARCH · CONTRARIAN BACKTEST

Did the short thesis hold up?

Imagine buying $1,000 of stock two weeks after each publisher’s first report on a company. Rank publishers by the resulting one and two year stock returns, then inspect every hypothetical trade and its source report.

Loading report and price history…

↓Lower long P&LBetter outcome for the bearish thesis
↑Higher long P&LWorse outcome for the bearish thesis
$Equal $1,000 tradesEach company counts once per publisher

01 / RANKINGS

Publisher scorecard

Ranked by average long P&L per completed trade. Negative values favor the short thesis.

Outcome window

· Download trade ledger CSV ↗

RankPublisherCompletedPrice coverageAvg long P&LTotal long P&LShort hit rateOther window avg

02 / TRADE DETAIL

Select a publisher

Each dot is one hypothetical $1,000 stock purchase. Click a dot to open the initial report.

Trade outcomes

Purchase date → long profit or loss at the selected horizon

One company per dot

Dots link to the initial publisher report when available. The vertical scale compresses extreme winners so smaller trades remain visible; exact dollars appear below.

Stock trades

Select a publisher to see the positions.

Stock / initial reportPublishedBoughtBuy closeShares for $1,000Value at horizonLong P&LReport source

03 / METHOD

What this measures

Initial publication

The first dated, ticker-matched short thesis or follow-up in the database for each publisher and company. Secondary index dates and archive timestamp proxies are labeled in the trade list. Earlier reports may be missing.

Hypothetical purchase

$1,000 divided by the first available split-adjusted closing price on or within seven calendar days after the report’s 14-day anniversary. Fractional shares are allowed.

One and two years

Value those shares at the first available close on or within seven calendar days after the purchase’s one or two year anniversary. Rankings use completed trades only; each eligible stock has equal initial dollars.

Limits

This is a long-stock thought experiment, not an actual short trade or a causal estimate. It omits dividends, fees, taxes, borrowing, delisting proceeds, and unresolved corporate actions. Price coverage is completed trades divided by trades old enough to reach that horizon. Missing prices can bias rankings.